Thursday, January 7, 2010

Two Cents on Prorogation

The debate about the prorogation of the Canadian Parliament, the second in a year and a half, represents a new low in Canadian political discourse.

While, state relations are beholden to corporate interests, and the state operates as much as a facilitator of capitalist accumulation as it does a representative of any real democratic interest the state and functional liberal democratic institutions remain important. With appropriate pressure the modern state can create material improvements in people's lives and the programs it maintains (health care, welfare, unemployment insurance) are important and need to be maintained and protected.

However, the recent move by Steven Harper regarding prorogation and the backlash/discourse surrounding it shows how far the discourse concerning liberal democracy in Canada has fallen. It has become a near radical position to assert that the Government of Canada should function according to the rules it sets for itself. The fact that we must protest and demand of Steven Harper the minute level of accountability afforded by a 19Th century elite focused institution is absurd.

While I do not support the prorogation of Parliament, and the avoidance of any measure of responsibility by Steven Harper and the Government of Canada, the proper functioning of Parliament is as much an absence of politics as it is a democratic expression of people.

While banal, the benefit of the debate over prorogation is that through its very absurdity (thank you prorogation for being such a foolish and esoteric word) it exposes the inadequacy of liberal democratic institutions more generally.

So as you protest against Steven Harper and the prorogation of Parliament keep in mind what you are supporting:

  • the continuation of ineffective committees. Committees that legitimate torture through its very discussion, and continue to deflect against the daily violence in Afghanistan.
  • A "question period" that is largely ignored and does nothing to hold the government to account and much to inflate the egos of politicians
  • A weekly meeting of 73 "businessmen", 51 lawyers, 46 "managers", 34 "consultants" and a host of other occupations meant to represent Canadian society at large
  • A list of Conservative Legislation that aims to among other things substantially increase prison sentences, remove Canada Posts exclusive privilege on foreign mail (that's for you Aaron), institute free trade agreements with Jordon, Columbia, Peru, and a number of other nasty things I'm to lazy to research at this time.

Now join that facebook group!

2 comments:

  1. So after reading your rant against the only , be it imperfect, institution that seperates us from anarchy what would you replace parliment with ?

    While I agree with you that Harper does the country a disservice to run and hide from any form of accountabilty, And that he treats us all with disrespect what would you put in its place

    ReplyDelete
  2. No solutions, only complaining. Thats what the internet is for.

    The answer to your question is complicated and one that I do not have the complete answer to. However, the solution involves streaching our thinking and looking beyond institutions and fears of "anarchy" to imagine what a fair and equitibale society would actually look like.

    The system we operate in is so messed up that it is difficult to conceptualize a society designed to meet human need, let alone provide concrete alternatives to our current institutional mix.

    So my cop-out answers to your question are more philosopy and something better.

    Thanks for your comment though

    ReplyDelete